<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Asterisk-based personal communication approach</title>
	<link>http://www.ampersand.com/blog/2005/07/20/asterisk-based-comm/</link>
	<description>Links and observations about VoIP, Presence, messaging, open source, blogs, and associated impact on society.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 02:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: toggy</title>
		<link>http://www.ampersand.com/blog/2005/07/20/asterisk-based-comm/#comment-3943</link>
		<dc:creator>toggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 22:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ampersand.com/blog/2005/07/20/asterisk-based-comm/#comment-3943</guid>
		<description>hi there, please provide some tech detail about what you did with asterisk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi there, please provide some tech detail about what you did with asterisk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve&#8217;s Tech Journal &#187; Verizon takes down Broadvoice again (I think)</title>
		<link>http://www.ampersand.com/blog/2005/07/20/asterisk-based-comm/#comment-3757</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve&#8217;s Tech Journal &#187; Verizon takes down Broadvoice again (I think)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 15:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ampersand.com/blog/2005/07/20/asterisk-based-comm/#comment-3757</guid>
		<description>[...] Yesterday many people were unable to reach me via my Asterisk-based unified number system.   They could call, but all they would get was dead air.  It&#8217;s back up now, but it was certainly inconvenient.  I called tech support at my VoIP provider (Broadvoice), and was told that there was an &#8220;issue&#8221; with a &#8220;third party carrier&#8221;, that affected &#8220;all customers in a very wide area&#8221;.   My number had been off the air since Wednesday evening, and didn&#8217;t come back for approximately 24 hours. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Yesterday many people were unable to reach me via my Asterisk-based unified number system.   They could call, but all they would get was dead air.  It&#8217;s back up now, but it was certainly inconvenient.  I called tech support at my VoIP provider (Broadvoice), and was told that there was an &#8220;issue&#8221; with a &#8220;third party carrier&#8221;, that affected &#8220;all customers in a very wide area&#8221;.   My number had been off the air since Wednesday evening, and didn&#8217;t come back for approximately 24 hours. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimbox</title>
		<link>http://www.ampersand.com/blog/2005/07/20/asterisk-based-comm/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>jimbox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 19:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ampersand.com/blog/2005/07/20/asterisk-based-comm/#comment-25</guid>
		<description>i've not yet attempted a wireless-&#62;voip lnp request but intend to try- but your post makes me anticipate trouble.  one thing that might help is the fcc's lnp complaint process:

http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/NumberPortability/
http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/consumerfacts/wirelessportability.html

there was actually another link somewhere too that had exact instructions within a faq.

i'm with you 100% and it appears we have similar efforts.  while i empathize with wireless carriers in having to deal with fcc regulation and fraudulent customers- i _emplore_ their incessant and relentless efforts to keep me in contract.  ...if i'm calling with problems- why would i want to upgrade my phone and obligate myself to another year of potentially inconsistent service?  prove yourself as reliable and i'd be happy to sign up for 5 years!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;ve not yet attempted a wireless-&gt;voip lnp request but intend to try- but your post makes me anticipate trouble.  one thing that might help is the fcc&#8217;s lnp complaint process:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/NumberPortability/" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/www.fcc.gov');">http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/NumberPortability/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/consumerfacts/wirelessportability.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/www.fcc.gov');">http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/consumerfacts/wirelessportability.html</a></p>
<p>there was actually another link somewhere too that had exact instructions within a faq.</p>
<p>i&#8217;m with you 100% and it appears we have similar efforts.  while i empathize with wireless carriers in having to deal with fcc regulation and fraudulent customers- i _emplore_ their incessant and relentless efforts to keep me in contract.  &#8230;if i&#8217;m calling with problems- why would i want to upgrade my phone and obligate myself to another year of potentially inconsistent service?  prove yourself as reliable and i&#8217;d be happy to sign up for 5 years!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve&#8217;s Tech Journal  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Search beats File</title>
		<link>http://www.ampersand.com/blog/2005/07/20/asterisk-based-comm/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve&#8217;s Tech Journal  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Search beats File</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 17:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ampersand.com/blog/2005/07/20/asterisk-based-comm/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>[...] o, as part of a large rework of personal communication strategy last month that I&#8217;ve previously talked about &#8212; I ditched it all.  All historical, painstakingly cr [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] o, as part of a large rework of personal communication strategy last month that I&#8217;ve previously talked about &#8212; I ditched it all.  All historical, painstakingly cr [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.ampersand.com/blog/2005/07/20/asterisk-based-comm/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2005 13:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ampersand.com/blog/2005/07/20/asterisk-based-comm/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Great comments -- Jamie, I will look into what you are suggesting. SMS is going to be a problem, already had a work colleague try to SMS me, thinking that my "mobile" number was a real mobile number.

DavidB -- what you suggest is imminently possible.  All it takes is a little work with the Asterisk dialplan.  Many people have set up similar configurations, and it's on my list to do so when I have the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great comments &#8212; Jamie, I will look into what you are suggesting. SMS is going to be a problem, already had a work colleague try to SMS me, thinking that my &#8220;mobile&#8221; number was a real mobile number.</p>
<p>DavidB &#8212; what you suggest is imminently possible.  All it takes is a little work with the Asterisk dialplan.  Many people have set up similar configurations, and it&#8217;s on my list to do so when I have the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
