<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Asterisk-based personal communication approach</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ampersand.com/blog/2005/07/20/asterisk-based-comm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ampersand.com/blog/2005/07/20/asterisk-based-comm/</link>
	<description>Links and observations about VoIP, Presence, messaging, open source, blogs, and associated impact on society.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Acrobat &#187; Is Asterisk ready for prime-time?</title>
		<link>http://www.ampersand.com/blog/2005/07/20/asterisk-based-comm/comment-page-1/#comment-90338</link>
		<dc:creator>Acrobat &#187; Is Asterisk ready for prime-time?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 19:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ampersand.com/blog/?p=46#comment-90338</guid>
		<description>[...] been thinking about setting up an environment similar to the one described in Steveâ€™s Tech Journal Â» New Asterisk-based personal communication approach and need to get a sense of when the time will be right to jump [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] been thinking about setting up an environment similar to the one described in Steveâ€™s Tech Journal Â» New Asterisk-based personal communication approach and need to get a sense of when the time will be right to jump [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toggy</title>
		<link>http://www.ampersand.com/blog/2005/07/20/asterisk-based-comm/comment-page-1/#comment-3943</link>
		<dc:creator>toggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 22:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ampersand.com/blog/?p=46#comment-3943</guid>
		<description>hi there, please provide some tech detail about what you did with asterisk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi there, please provide some tech detail about what you did with asterisk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve&#8217;s Tech Journal &#187; Verizon takes down Broadvoice again (I think)</title>
		<link>http://www.ampersand.com/blog/2005/07/20/asterisk-based-comm/comment-page-1/#comment-3757</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve&#8217;s Tech Journal &#187; Verizon takes down Broadvoice again (I think)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 15:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ampersand.com/blog/?p=46#comment-3757</guid>
		<description>[...] Yesterday many people were unable to reach me via my Asterisk-based unified number system.Â Â  They could call, but all they would get was dead air.Â  It&#8217;s back up now, but it was certainly inconvenient.Â  I called tech support at my VoIP provider (Broadvoice), and was told that there was an &#8220;issue&#8221; with a &#8220;third party carrier&#8221;, that affected &#8220;all customers in a very wide area&#8221;.Â Â  My number had been off the air since Wednesday evening, and didn&#8217;t come back for approximately 24 hours. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yesterday many people were unable to reach me via my Asterisk-based unified number system.Â Â  They could call, but all they would get was dead air.Â  It&#8217;s back up now, but it was certainly inconvenient.Â  I called tech support at my VoIP provider (Broadvoice), and was told that there was an &#8220;issue&#8221; with a &#8220;third party carrier&#8221;, that affected &#8220;all customers in a very wide area&#8221;.Â Â  My number had been off the air since Wednesday evening, and didn&#8217;t come back for approximately 24 hours. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimbox</title>
		<link>http://www.ampersand.com/blog/2005/07/20/asterisk-based-comm/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>jimbox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 19:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ampersand.com/blog/?p=46#comment-25</guid>
		<description>i've not yet attempted a wireless-&gt;voip lnp request but intend to try- but your post makes me anticipate trouble.  one thing that might help is the fcc's lnp complaint process:

http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/NumberPortability/
http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/consumerfacts/wirelessportability.html

there was actually another link somewhere too that had exact instructions within a faq.

i'm with you 100% and it appears we have similar efforts.  while i empathize with wireless carriers in having to deal with fcc regulation and fraudulent customers- i _emplore_ their incessant and relentless efforts to keep me in contract.  ...if i'm calling with problems- why would i want to upgrade my phone and obligate myself to another year of potentially inconsistent service?  prove yourself as reliable and i'd be happy to sign up for 5 years!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;ve not yet attempted a wireless-&gt;voip lnp request but intend to try- but your post makes me anticipate trouble.  one thing that might help is the fcc&#8217;s lnp complaint process:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/NumberPortability/" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/www.fcc.gov');">http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/NumberPortability/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/consumerfacts/wirelessportability.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/www.fcc.gov');">http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/consumerfacts/wirelessportability.html</a></p>
<p>there was actually another link somewhere too that had exact instructions within a faq.</p>
<p>i&#8217;m with you 100% and it appears we have similar efforts.  while i empathize with wireless carriers in having to deal with fcc regulation and fraudulent customers- i _emplore_ their incessant and relentless efforts to keep me in contract.  &#8230;if i&#8217;m calling with problems- why would i want to upgrade my phone and obligate myself to another year of potentially inconsistent service?  prove yourself as reliable and i&#8217;d be happy to sign up for 5 years!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve&#8217;s Tech Journal  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Search beats File</title>
		<link>http://www.ampersand.com/blog/2005/07/20/asterisk-based-comm/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve&#8217;s Tech Journal  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Search beats File</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 17:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ampersand.com/blog/?p=46#comment-23</guid>
		<description>[...] o, as part of a large rework of personal communication strategy last month that I&#8217;ve previously talked about &#8212; I ditched it all.  All historical, painstakingly cr [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] o, as part of a large rework of personal communication strategy last month that I&#8217;ve previously talked about &#8212; I ditched it all.  All historical, painstakingly cr [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

